Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-7888499-20151022220452/@comment-27281875-20160407160254

85.108.171.133 wrote: M.A.D.company wrote: And i must say no, an attractor field hadn't an exact extension of 1%. If it had, where you see this information? Where did you see that the field hasn't got an exact extension of %1?

there are seven digits in divergence points. If there is a enough divergence to change first point.(For example: X.000000: If there is a enough divergence point to change X to another number, A new attractor field appears due to big divergence. SG worldline is not an exception in Beta AF, it is not included in it, there might be other worldlines that extends from 1.000000 to 1.048596 that is not covered by Alpha AF nor Beta AF.

And where exactly you get the info that the first digit in Divergence number is the label for Attractor Field? Attractor Field in the story itself is proven by the same events in the future a worldline holds, not just simply by the first digit in Divergence Number. Divergence Number against worldlines is like a serial number, hence an Attractor Field is a list / group of worldlines that holds the same future event.

Divergence Number is used to measure how big the difference of current worldline and another worldline by comparing current worldline's Divergence Number with the other worldline's Divergence Number, but not to pinpoint exact Attractor Field, since Attractor field is like fixated chain of events in multiple worldline.

I didn't fully disagree on your opinion about the first digit of Divergence Number labels an exact Attractor Field, in my opinion it is close enough, but there's no way to point exact worldline border of an Attractor Field. There might be worldlines that has certain events from 2 Attractor Fields that lies between those 2 AF itself, example is SG worldline in which has some feature of both Alpha and Beta AF in which both Mayuri and Kurisu lives.