Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-7888499-20151022220452/@comment-85.108.171.133-20160407151509

M.A.D.company wrote: And i must say no, an attractor field hadn't an exact extension of 1%. If it had, where you see this information? Where did you see that the field hasn't got an exact extension of %1?

there are seven digits in divergence points. If there is a enough divergence to change first point.(For example: X.000000: If there is a enough divergence point to change X to another number, A new attractor field appears due to big divergence.