Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-7888499-20151022220452/@comment-26377724-20160408091600

Anon i think i see the point, it's a difference between our interpretation of the meaning of the divergence number.

To summarize, us we think the divergence number is a physical mesure of the worldline divergence and in consequence the limit between attractor fields isn't necessary at 1.000000% and an attractor field hadn't an extension of 1.000000%.

For exemple we can have alpha AF from 0% (the only value set arbitrary) to 1.04%

Beta AF from 1.05% to 2.19%

Gamma AF from 2.20% to 2.84%

And at worldlines at the frontier of attractor field (in this case all worldlines at 1.04XXXX% and 2.19XXXX%) can share characteristics of both attractor fields.

You think the first digit of the divergence number is the signification of the attractor field but this explanation IMO isn't satisfactionnary because that makes the SG worldline an anomaly unlike our opinion which set it to a frontier. That make it more Astrophysical-friendly.